Was the American frontier a setting for pioneers or a battle of ethnicity and race? - saga frontier j
Full Question: On the border of a number of English settlers, or a clash of ethnic and race?
I am interested specifically in the war of American Indians and how the Americans viewed the Indians who occupied the western territories.
Other themes work together to:
1. Do you think that these are American soldiers, settlers / so hard on the Indians, especially because of race, to the wishes of the world against it?
2. Do you know how the Americans have tried to take account of Aboriginal culture by the children in "Boarding is going" to be justified?
3. What do you think the number of treaties, broken promises or Native Americans?
Thanks in advance!
Saturday, November 7, 2009
Saga Frontier J Was The American Frontier A Setting For Pioneers Or A Battle Of Ethnicity And Race?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
I would not call it "English" speaking people as speakers of Spanish and French played an important role in expanding the borders and immigrants from many other European countries who speak little or no English.
The wars between the natives and the Americans were complicated. In the south of the Spaniard, especially in a war of extermination. Betrayals less north, less intense and there were wars and attrocieties.
Relations with America, sometimes open design. The Cherokee, in any attempt to ally with the Americans, and sometimes helped us overcome many enemies. Most Cherokees also have the American culture and traditions.
I believe above all that the earth's resources and those wars that were on the point were mainly reflects the underlying racism Cherokee contributed to problems. The eye of retaliation and the inability of Americans to distinguish between the actions of the various tribes. A attrocity is required by a strain assigned to all tribes. This perpetuates the cycle. Massecred A group of women and childrenother, so that the other group retaliated by you as well. Soon, the dead stacked in piles.
I think the schools were and how well intended. It was less of a to their culture in an effort to welcome them to destroy the American culture. The racist elements, the efforts to Americanize the natives. Those who want to help keep the natives than the Americanization.
Broken promises and treaties are a disgrace to both parties. Note that the Americans were not the only ones who violate the agreements and promises. We concentrate on them because we felt the natives savages and restraitnt not follow the agreements that we "should be civilized" people take the blame. The reality is that problems on both sides. Our inability to effectively absorb and together with the Indian tribes influenced our culture and our nation. He's even worse in Thiers.
Here you will find the definition of "leading question" that you will save time.
Well, first and foremost, this is issue an opinion. Personally, for me, I think the problem was mainly for the country and no race was more involved. According to some sources, however, that can make copies of each argument, for example, is the white man's burden, solely on the basis of race. It regulates the responsibility of all "white and civilized" world, maintain and distribute the forms of "right". Manifest Destiny and the westward expansion. In this he was sent to America to shine from coast to coast. During this time, Manifest Destiny sets seem to make much of the ideals of the pioneers of their actions justified. But is it really your opinion to decide which was justified, and why.
Andrew Jackson was against the Indians (before his presidency, while the Seminoles from Florida) to continue. He moved the Indians, who cause problems on the East Coast across the Mississippi River. He promised that would not be threatened and that this spacer they permanent. But after the Mexican cession has acquired from Mexico, the expansion has been easy. The Seminoles had to settle in places that do not cross through and pioneers are threatened, too. Many other tribes to move deserves, and there are many stories about them ar catastrophic.
From then until the First World War, Indians were slaughtered in the truest sense of the word. The slaughter at Wounded Knee, the Trail of Tears, Nez Perce, the Sioux Indians, all were the massacres of Indians by the American people. The most common cause of death in aboriginal United States is by far the railroads. And they were certainly in the country and not the breed. The railroads have killed the buffalo plains and the lack of buffalo, the Indians began to die.
Overall, the American society through the expansion and the acquisition of new land in question. This was determined by the difference in the races that do not seem in which the Americans about the life or death of a Native American nursing. But it is still a matter of opinion is not it? WHat do you think?
Post a Comment